New site? Maybe some day. Username: SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F) Message: UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop Select Color orange orange-red crimson red firebrick dark red green limegreen teal silver sea-green deeppink tomato coral purple indigo burlywood sandy brown sienna chocolate FONTXXSmallXSmallSmallMediumLargeXLXXL :DG: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Char† ‡ ‰ ♠ ♣ ♥ ♦ ‾ ← ↑ → ↓ ™ – —   ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ ¦ § ¨ © ª « ¬ ­ ® ¯ ° ± ² ³ ´ µ ¶ · ¸ ¹ º » ¼ ½ ¾ ¿ À Á Â Ã Ä Å Æ Ç È É Ê Ë Ì Í Î Ï Ð Ñ Ò Ó Ô Õ Ö × Ø Ù Ú Û Ü Ý Þ ß à á â ã ä å æ ç è é ê ë ì í î ï ð ñ ò ó ô õ ö ÷ ø ù ú û ü ý þ ÿ b i u  add: url  image  video(?) : post by corpus_colostomy at 2008-06-19 18:29:24 powerkok said [orig][quote] I GOT ?'S : Fish, that dc 'crushes' more than the rec? the dc-5 gets a much wider tonal spectrum than the rectoid and there is strong, intelligible variations in tone from 1-10 on each pot. the parametric eq is a really awesome feature and adds alot for fine tuning and shaping. it has characteristically, much "sweeter" tones imo than the recto. what sets the unit apart from others is that it has truly dynamic mids and an overall warm, organic sound that is uncommon these days. but as to which one crushes more, it's simple. 50 watts vs 150 watts.

[default homepage]

[print][

2:24:28am May 19,2024 load time 0.02327 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]