Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by Dankill at 2009-09-06 11:42:48

WOW, did not see this coming and yet I can understand some angles of it.
1. This settles the Wilfork or Seymour debate on who to sign. With Seymour done and the capspace that frees up, Vince is gonna be the guy they make a new contract for.
2. Seymour is getting older, granted he's only gonna be 30. They must smell decline on him and figure they either got someone else they can trust with his position or someone else in their sights to trade for.
3. At least with trading him to Oakland, they send him to a team that can't hurt them and pretty much SUCKS while being run by one of the worst organizations in the NFL. If they keep sucking, in two years that could be a high first round pick. Use it or trade it, the Pats can turn that pick into something good in the long run.
I'll be the first to admit this looks like a risky move, but the Pats never do something like this rashly. There has to be a plan behind it.

[default homepage]

[print][

6:15:43am May 10,2024
load time 0.01186 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]