Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by porphyria at 2009-11-30 11:12:16

aril said	[orig][quote]
He was a demolitions expert in the military and that's what he argues. Looks like you're in luck.

absurd! It doesn't take a physics expert to understand that the towers collapsed due to weakening, not complete failure. Just because engineers claimed the towers could withstand a jet crashing into them doesn't mean shit, was it ever tested and proven to scale? no. Having the weight 20-30 floors above the weakened breaking point would cause the rapid fall (with no visual 'pancaking'). When they mention explosions on floors below the collapse, WELL DUH, imagine how much air/pressure is being pushed down throughout the building during collapse, of course it's going to make windows blow out, ect.

[default homepage]

[print][

1:33:37am May 23,2024
load time 0.03028 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]