Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Username:
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:


UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u  add: url  image  video(?)
: post by porphyria at 2009-11-30 11:36:12
1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration

DUH. If the planes had crashed at the very top of the each tower they might have withstood, it was the weight of multiple floors above each crash point, of course it's going to fall quickly with that much weight above.

2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution

hahaha, okay, so how is a 100 floor building 'suppose' to collapse, into a nice neat pile easy to clean?

14. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire

Yeah, when was the last time two jetliners filled with fuel crash into the twin towers at 400-500mph+? oh wait, never.

[default homepage] [print][2:39:40pm May 24,2024
load time 0.00676 secs/10 queries]
[search][refresh page]