New site? Maybe some day.
Username:
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Select Color
orange
orange-red
crimson
red
firebrick
dark red
green
limegreen
teal
silver
sea-green
deeppink
tomato
coral
purple
indigo
burlywood
sandy brown
sienna
chocolate
FONT
XXSmall
XSmall
Small
Medium
Large
XL
XXL
:DG:
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Char
†
‡
‰
♠
♣
♥
♦
‾
←
↑
→
↓
™
–
—
¡
¢
£
¤
¥
¦
§
¨
©
ª
«
¬
®
¯
°
±
²
³
´
µ
¶
·
¸
¹
º
»
¼
½
¾
¿
À
Á
Â
Ã
Ä
Å
Æ
Ç
È
É
Ê
Ë
Ì
Í
Î
Ï
Ð
Ñ
Ò
Ó
Ô
Õ
Ö
×
Ø
Ù
Ú
Û
Ü
Ý
Þ
ß
à
á
â
ã
ä
å
æ
ç
è
é
ê
ë
ì
í
î
ï
ð
ñ
ò
ó
ô
õ
ö
÷
ø
ù
ú
û
ü
ý
þ
ÿ
b
i
u
add:
url
image
video
(
?
)
Message:
you are ab-using [QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Woah!_Shut_It_Down!.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
[QUOTE="Woah!_Shut_It_Down!:1086099"]Meh, Metal Archives reviews are to be taken with a grain fo salt anyway, seeing as most people on there are a) elitists or b) people who think their views are life-changing and everyone should think like them or c) assholes with too much time to waste and writing blatantly wrong things(Necrophagist has no riffs? WHAT?). In reality most negative MA reviews are the result of internet roid rage, seeing as few metal albums or bands are truly bad except Jugulator(Judas Priest tried to go HEVY AZ FUKK) and Manowar(the whole thing). I've only written 4 reviews for that site, two of which didn't get accepted and one of those wouldn't be up today anyway because it was for BMTH. I gave 'em a 70 because I'm nice like that. Respek.[/QUOTE]
UBB
enabled
. HTML
disabled
Spam Filtering
enabled
Icons: (click image to insert)
Show All
-
pop
[
default homepage
]
[
print
][
2:17:26am May 19,2024
load time 0.00707 secs/10 queries]
[
search
]
[
refresh page
]